All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant C (De facto Error) did not employ AD, a juvenile, as an entertainment entertainment entertainment entertainment worker, at around 04:35 October 2, 201, at “BH A” around 04:35.

The above defendant found four male guests who were young in the new wall and called "DN" and called "DN" and called four amusement reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception reception.

Nevertheless, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged. The court below erred by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. Defendant E (Unfairly Undue Practices) The punishment imposed by the court below on Defendant E (hereinafter “the fine of KRW 4 million”) is too unreasonable.

C. Defendant K (M) misunderstanding of facts on July 26, 201, Defendant K’s 1 did not have employed AE, a juvenile, as an entertainment entertainment drinking house, at around 23:00 on July 26, 201. The above Defendant concurrently operates “AH” entertainment drinking house and “AC”, unlike “AC”, and the entertainment drinking house with “AH”, there is no need for entertainment entertainment reception reception room through a news report room. Nevertheless, the lower court found Defendant guilty of employing the above juvenile at “AH” entertainment drinking house among the facts charged against the above Defendant. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment. (2) The sentence (a fine of KRW 2.5 million) imposed by the lower court on Defendant K is too unreasonable.

Defendant

R (Unfairity of Punishment) The punishment imposed by the court below on Defendant R (1.5 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

E. Defendant U (M by mistake of facts and unreasonable sentencing) 1 of U. U. U. U. on October 201 at the main point of “BM” around 12:10 on the date and at around 12:10 on the date, Defendant U.S. as a juvenile as an entertainment receptionist.