logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.03.25 2018가단3167
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: KRW 10,100,00 for Plaintiff A, Plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F, respectively, and each of the said money on June 30, 2016.

Reasons

1. The following facts are acknowledged according to the respective descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

On June 29, 2016, around 08:35, the Defendant had been negligent in driving the I vehicle in the street room located at H, while driving the I vehicle to turn to the left from the J side, by taking into account the situation of the Owing road in the direction of the Owing. However, the Defendant had been negligent in driving the I vehicle in advance, and caused the Plaintiff A’s warning engine, who was working at the place of the public health clinic from the mawing side to the public health clinic.

At the time, the network K (hereinafter referred to as "the network") on which he was accompanied by the chief of the police station at the time fell on the road to the right-hand side of the horse.

On June 30, 2016, when the Deceased was hospitalized at the Jeju University Hospital, he/she died due to “a wide range of skins and livering livers from the alleys and alleys, which appears to have been formed in the process of falling, and died due to “a wide range of skins and livers from the alleys and alleys from the alleys, and from the alleys.”

Plaintiff

A The husband, the plaintiff B, C, D, E, and F of the deceased are children of the deceased.

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The defendant asserts that "the deceased does not fall on the road due to the collision between the defendant's vehicle and the driver's vehicle, but fall during the course of the plaintiff's towing machine after the collision, and thus the causal relationship between the above collision and the deceased's death is not recognized." Thus, the defendant first examines this.

According to the purport of the evidence Nos. 2-1 and 2-2 and the whole arguments, the Road Traffic Authority's Jeju-do branch takes into account road conditions at the request of the Jeju District Prosecutors' Office as data such as the road situation, vehicle and chiller damage status, the defendant and the plaintiff's police statements, etc. after the collision, and analyzes the final location of the horse racing after the collision, the fall location of the deceased, etc., and then "the point of collision and collision between the defendant's vehicle and the horse at the time" are the same as the attached picture, and the chiller is the defendant.

arrow