1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the cases where the part of the first instance court's 4th to 5th to 17th 5th 14th 4th 4th 4th 4th 5th 5th 5th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 200, which is the same as that of the judgment

2. The part "Ma. The defendants claim that they are lessees or lien holders of the building of this case before the compulsory auction procedure for the building of this case is in progress, and jointly occupy the building of this case. [Grounds for recognition] The facts that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4, 7, and 9 (each entry, including the serial number, and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the defendants jointly possess the building of this case on the land of this case without legitimate source of right in relation to the plaintiff, who is the owner of the forest of this case, and thereby interfere with the plaintiff's exercise of ownership. Thus, the defendants have the duty to withdraw the plaintiff from the building of this case.

A person shall be appointed.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case, including the claim extended in the trial, should be accepted due to the reasons, so the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as ordered.