A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 21, 2018, around 19:25, the Defendant, following the victim E (the age of 18) who walked and walked in the subway 2 line D line, located in Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, for the line D line D line D in Mapo-gu, made a arms between the victim’s right shoulder and the blue joints, and “the blue, flue,” and “the blue, flue, flue, flue,” flue the victim’s arms again, flue the victim’s arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Investigation reports (The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTVs analysis for the DNA subway stations);

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (one month is detained and thus his/her mistake is against himself/herself, there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and considering the circumstances, such as the details of the crime, etc.);

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to attend a lecture;

1. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the proviso to Article 56(1) of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse against Children and Juveniles against whom an employment restriction order is exempted: (b) the effect of preventing recidivism is expected to be effective by the registration of personal information and an order to attend a lecture for treatment of sexual assault; and (c) the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, benefits expected by an employment restriction order and the effect of preventing sex crimes; and (d) the disadvantage and anticipated side effects of the Defendant, there are extenuating circumstances where the Defendant’

I think)

Where the conviction of this case becomes final and conclusive, the defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to the relevant agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act.

However, there is a history of punishment for the same crime.