The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant, while driving on the road, stops with the wind of the start, and does not interfere with traffic by intentionally stopping.

Nevertheless, the lower court convicted the Defendant on the charge of interfering with general traffic among the facts charged in the instant case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts.

2. The judgment below held that the defendant's vehicle was parked on the side while the bus stops on the side while the bus stops on the side, since the change of the bus line along which the defendant moves across two laness on the part of the defendant, driving a bus in the vicinity of D or driving a bus in the vicinity of D, the direction at the time of sticking on the bus does not turn on. The defendant's vehicle stops on the side while the bus stops on the bus, but it seems that the above bus stops on the side, but it was seen that the above bus stops on the side, and even when the vehicle of the defendant did not stop on the side at the time of shock with the signal, etc., the defendant's vehicle did not stop on the bus at the time of shock with the above bus. Thus, the fact that the brac, etc. did not go through the brac.

In light of the circumstances such as difficult to see, the Defendant convicted him of this part of the facts charged that he intentionally obstructed traffic by stopping in front of the bus.

Examining the above judgment of the court below in a thorough comparison with the records, it is just and acceptable, and there is no error of mistake of fact as pointed out by the defendant.

The defendant's above assertion is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.