logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.03.30 2015고단8856
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drawing without a license) driving a B-sed car at around 2km section of approximately 0.080 percent of alcohol concentration in blood without a driver’s license from around September 23:50, 2015 to the front of the square of the Sunam-dong located in the Sinsan-gu, Busan Metropolitan City from around 2km away from around 13:50.

2. On September 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was found to have driven alcohol on the road in front of the plaza of the Singu of Busan on September 23:50, 2015; and (b) was discovered to have the public document indicating that the D’s driver’s license under the name of the Commissioner General of the Busan Regional Police Agency, which is a public document in possession of a person who is required to submit a driver’s license from the Busan Franchi Police Station guard, was a public document in possession of the person who is required to do so.

3. Counterfeiting a private signature and exercising a signature on the said investigation.

A. The Defendant, at the same date and time as Paragraph 1, and at a place as Busan Francing Police Station guard and a slope C belonging to Busan Francing a driver's license, presented D's license to the police officer, and used D's signature to enter D's personal information and drinking driving into a portable information device (PDA) and to exercise his/her authority, and forged D's signature on the above portable information device without authority, i.e.,, as if D's signature was genuine, she presented it to the above C as if D's letter was genuine.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, prepared a statement report on the situation of the driver at the State, and demanded signature from the above C to the driver, entered the name of D without authority for the purpose of exercising his/her signature on the driver’s column and forged D’s signature, i.e.,, forged D’s signature at the seat, and presented it to the above C as if the signature was genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow