Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Facts charged 2013
9. On 14. 09:05, the victim suffered from the victim E, who was drunk by the Defendant at “Dju store” located in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the victim called “B,” “I, who is a delivery provider, and currently is currently unable to sell tobacco during the absence of its business.”
The Defendant committed assault against the victim, such as “I am on the left side of the victim, I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part
2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. The victim E expressed his/her intention not to be punished by the defendant while attending the court as a witness on July 24, 2014. Thus, the prosecution of the instant case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.