1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant)’s principal claim expanded from the trial, is as follows:

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows. The "a summary of the party's assertion" in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. "3-C, D." in the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows. 4-20 as "a deposit under the contract of this case", "a deposit under the contract of this case", 5-3, and 4-2 as "the defendant", "the defendant", 4-5, and 707 as "the defendant", and "the defendant" as "the defendant", 708, 709, 710, and 711" were added, and the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act in addition to adding "Nos. 708, 709, 710, and 711."

2. Summary of the parties’ assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the Plaintiff performed the overall management of the building under the instant contract, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the contract cost and deposit. As seen earlier, only the sum of the contract cost from December 2, 2012 to October 2013, 2011,963,858 won was paid, and (i) the remainder of the contract cost from October 2013 to April 2014 or the instant contract was terminated, the Plaintiff performed the management of the building of this case for the same period, however, the Plaintiff’s performance of the management of the building of this case’s remuneration amounting to KRW 70,460,69; and (ii) the sum of the contract cost paid from May 20, 2014 to August 20, 2014 to KRW 38,878,766; and (iii) the amount equivalent to the total of the contract cost paid from December 20, 2012 to KRW 205 to 274,27127.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the total amount of 127,212,05 won and delay damages for the contract, remuneration, and indemnity payable to the plaintiff.

(Causes of Claim). (b)

The defendant's assertion (i.e., contract cost).