A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months and a fine for 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant, at around 03:30 on August 15, 2014, committed indecent act by compulsion, on the top of DK5 vehicles operated by the Defendant, she committed an indecent act by force by force, by inserting her hand in the victim’s clothes under the influence of alcohol while she was on board the victim E (n.e., female, 24 years old) on the top of the DK5 vehicles operated by the Defendant. On three occasions, the Defendant placed her finger into the victim’s clothes under the influence of alcohol, and by walking the victim’s eaves in his/her hands, she took three times the chest.

2. No person who rents any commercial motor vehicle of the rent-a-car business operator violating the Passenger Transport Service Act shall use it for transport with compensation or rent it to any third party;

Nevertheless, at around 03:30 on May 15, 2014, the Defendant driven approximately 10km section in front of the Silung-si, Ansan-si, a rental vehicle, with freight of KRW 20,000,000 on the DK5 car, which is a rental vehicle, and received freight of KRW 20,000,000,000, from the front of the Silung-si, for viewing.

Accordingly, the Defendant leased a car of a car rental business operator and used it for transport with compensation.

3. Around 03:30 on August 15, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) driven DK5 vehicles in a section of about 10 km from the front side of the C-ro located in the Ansan-si, Ansan-si, to the front day of the Silung-si, Silsan-si, without a driver’s license.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and his defense counsel asserted that at the time of the crime, the defendant did not take charge of E's chest or show the sound of E as stated in the facts charged. However, considering the statement consistent with the criminal facts of paragraph (1) of the victim E's investigation agency to this court and consistent with the specific decision, there seems to be no reason for the victim to first gather the defendant, and considering the circumstances where the victim did not have any circumstance to demand money from the defendant after the crime of this case, it appears that the defendant's statement is more reliable than the defendant's statement, so the defendant's argument with the defense counsel is reasonable.