logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고정1565
향토예비군설치법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2018 Go fixed 1565] The defendant is a member of the local reserve forces belonging to the 3rd and 8th Dong.

1. On September 13, 2016, the Defendant failed to undergo the said training without justifiable grounds even after receiving a notice of convening a local reserve force training in the name of the third unit commander of the 2997 unit of the 2997 unit commander of the Army, which caused the second supplementary training (24 hours) conducted at the training site of the Geumcheon-gu Seoul Central District Reserve Forces from September 21, 2016 to September 23, 2016.

2. On September 13, 2016, the Defendant received a notice of convening a local reserve force training in the name of the third unit commander of the 2997 unit in the Army that he/she would receive secondary supplementary training (six hours) on September 28, 2016 at the place of residence of the Defendant, Jung-gu Seoul Central District Court B 204, the Defendant did not receive the said training without justifiable grounds.

3. On September 13, 2016, the Defendant received a notice of convening a local reserve force training in the name of the third unit commander of the 2997 unit in the Army that he/she would receive secondary supplementary training (six hours) on September 30, 2016 at the place of residence of the Defendant, Jung-gu Seoul Central District Court B 204, the Defendant did not receive the said training without justifiable grounds.

[2018 High 1566] The defendant is a member of the reserve forces belonging to the 3rd 8-Dong, Jung-gu, Seoul.

On October 1, 2016, the Defendant transferred from Jung-gu Seoul Central Government to the Buddhist land.

Members of the reserve forces shall, when moving their places of residence, report to the head of Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the relevant place of residence.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not make a move-in report to the head of the Gu having jurisdiction over the place of residence and made it possible to register ex officio residence unknown on January 10, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant could not deliver a notice of convening a training call sent from the above company to the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

[2018 High Court Decision 1565]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Criminal records, certificates of delivery of multiple copies, certificates of receipt, certified copies of resident registration cards, and resident organization cards of local reserve forces;

arrow