Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bsch Rexton car.

On February 24, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 06:47, and led to the driving of the road in front of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Seoul, a three-lane direction from the direction of the Korean boundary to the direction of the two-lane.

In this case, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the motor vehicle on the front side and to safely operate the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to operate the center line and received the front part of the vehicle of the victim D (45 S) which was driven by the negligence of running the center line in front of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as a scam scam scam scam scams, etc., which requires approximately 14 weeks of medical treatment to the victim D, and the victim F (38 years of age) who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, including two cam scam scams, which require approximately 4 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Order to Attend a lecture is that the defendant collisions with the damaged vehicle running in the direction of the central line, and the negligence of the accident is very significant, and the victim suffered heavy injury from the 14 weeks and the 4 weeks in the front line, and the defendant's vehicle is not covered by the comprehensive motor vehicle insurance, and even before the instant case, it seems that the defendant has caused an accident due to the median of the central line and caused the occurrence of the accident and repeated driving of the accident, such as the record of punishment and the record of punishment in violation of overtaking methods, etc.