1. The Defendant’s KRW 60,000,000 as well as its annual 20% from April 4, 2015 to September 30, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

According to the evidence No. 1 of the judgment on the cause of the claim No. 1, it is recognized that the defendant confirmed that he/she had the obligation to pay KRW 60 million to the plaintiff, and that he/she agreed to repay the obligation to the plaintiff until December 30, 2012.

According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above KRW 60 million and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from April 4, 2015 to September 30, 2015, which is the day following the delivery day of the original copy of the payment order of this case sought by the plaintiff, and 15% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.

The defendant's assertion is alleged that the expenses incurred by the defendant in the course of promising marriage with his/her father and wife are included in the above KRW 60 million, and thus cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim. However, the above argument alone cannot be asserted against the plaintiff's claim.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.