The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one year of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment is based on the following facts: although the defendant was found to have committed the crime of this case, even though he was aware that the crime related to the illegal game room has a great social hazard, such as encouraging the citizens to commit an excessive speculative spirit, undermining sound labor awareness, and it is not eradicated despite continuous control, the crime related to the illegal game room is highly likely to require strict punishment; the defendant was likely to have set up CCTV and a strong steel book, etc. in the game room and actively avoided detection; the defendant was tryed to conceal the crime under the name of J as the head of the branch of the name of the business in the name of J even though the defendant actually operated the business; the defendant was punished for the same crime; the defendant has the history of having been punished for a fine; the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive, means and consequence; and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Therefore, the above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.