1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. On October 31, 2013, the Plaintiff, who is a medical specialist, had a nurse’s assistant nurse (E) of the skin urology operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) for the cather catology (hereinafter “this case’s cather cather cather”) that prescribes the symptoms of male pit.

B. On November 2, 2013, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in C Hospital and received treatment on November 5, 2013, such as undergoing a diversopic incinary surgery, and discharged on January 4, 2014. On January 6, 2014, the Plaintiff was diagnosed to require approximately three weeks of treatment due to the blood transfusions from the right side and the hiversary surgery at the above hospital.

C. Thereafter, on August 1, 2014, the Plaintiff received a permanent disability diagnosis that there was a fall of approximately 26% of the working ability due to the dynamic damage (hereinafter “instant symptoms”) on the right-hand part and the peltour part of the Maurg (hereinafter “instant symptoms”) from the hospital.

【Ground of recognition】 The facts without any dispute, Gap 2, 4, 5, 6, Eul 1-1, 2, Eul 3, Eul 5-1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether liability for damages arises;

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion lies in the Plaintiff’s treatment of the instant injection, and the Defendant caused the Plaintiff’s symptoms by causing the Plaintiff to have the Plaintiff’s body of the Plaintiff’s body of the Plaintiff due to medical negligence, or by allowing the Plaintiff to contact with the Plaintiff’s her mouth. At the time, the Defendant violated the Plaintiff’s duty of explanation on the side effects such as blood species, infection, and negotisis

Therefore, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for damages caused by the symptoms of this case.

B. Medical practice on medical malpractice is an area requiring highly specialized knowledge, and it is extremely difficult to find out whether a doctor’s duty of care was violated in the medical process, and whether there was causation between the breach of duty of care and the occurrence of damages. Therefore, medical practice on medical malpractice is serious to patients during surgery or after surgery.