logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.07.21 2017고단2215
협박
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

1. On May 17, 2017, the Defendant entered the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D (Woo, 54 years old) located in Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, Daejeon-dong, and the two different distances in the main room, and whether the Defendant “the victim now has been changed.”

“The knife is found to the victim”.

Csusu Office is called Csusu

When there are the witnesses, it shall be done as soon as possible.

“Intimidating the victim”, the victim was threatened.

2. On May 19, 2017, at the same place as around 11:00, the Defendant is not a victim who was engaged in business in order to receive an in-depth group customer.

If there is no death, a person shall die even if he/she dies.

The victim threatened the victim by referring to the “Cunk Mak”.

2. Determination

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. Submission of a written agreement with the victim who wishes not to punish the defendant after the indictment of this case

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow