The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff, including expenses incurred by supplementary participation.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (except for the part pertaining to March 2, 199) except for the modification of the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following Paragraph 2 and the addition of the judgment as stated in

2.The modification shall add to “I” of 5 pages 5 to “I” the following Notes:

【1) In the complaint and the preparatory brief dated October 14, 2019, the Plaintiff entered the name of the joint line that the Defendant is the subject of the salary inspector into “A Q”, but this is a clerical error in “I”.

The following is added to the 5th day below the 3th day below. The plaintiff set up the defendant as a clan which is composed of the descendants of Dm 22 descendants I through the brief of summary dispute settlement on June 15, 2020.

The following is added after the 6th below the 6th "facts". <3> The 5th below the 6th " fact that the plaintiff is the descendants of AB, AG, AI, AH, AE, AD, AJ also among the persons claiming the defendant's closing members, is the descendants of AR, AB, AH, AE, AD, AJ also, and AJ shall include the 10th number of evidence No. 2, B, and the 10th number of evidence No. 2.

3. Supplement and addition of judgments;

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “the Intervenor”) who held an extraordinary general meeting of this case without the Plaintiff’s assertion procedure and led to the sale of each forest of this case (hereinafter “the Intervenor”) did not have any interest in assisting the Intervenor.

The plaintiff asserts that the defendant's intervenor is not qualified as the defendant's intervenor, and it is judged on the ground that there is no supplementary participant's interest.

B. Determination 1) Any third party who has an interest in the outcome of the relevant legal doctrine may participate in a lawsuit pending before the court in order to assist either party (Article 71 of the Civil Procedure Act). The term “interest” is not de facto an economic or emotional interest.