The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant (a fine of KRW 15 million) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and against his mistake; (b) the Defendant did not have any previous error; and (c) the Defendant appears to not have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to have been able to receive profits from the game room operation period

However, this type of crime, however, needs to be strictly punished because of the encouragement of excessive speculative spirit to the general public and the elimination of continuous crackdowns. In full view of the fact that the game provided in the game of this case does not amount to 36 times, such as the game period up to 36 times, etc., and other factors of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, happiness and family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, it does not seem that the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.