The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On January 27, 2013, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of danger in advance, on the grounds that the Defendant, within the middle temperature room in Ulsan-gun B, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-si, and reported soup out of the soup, he completed soup. As such, the place is so she was so so she was she at the entrance of the entrance in a state where the first she is unfree due to the bryrral, and there is a high risk that people sit on the entrance of the entrance and would lead to another person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and flashed, and flashed at the entrance of the victim D at the time, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as the left-hand flash, which requires medical treatment for 14 days.

2. The above facts charged constitute an offense falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act, which is a crime of non-prosecution under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished on November 13, 2013, which was after the instant prosecution was instituted, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.