logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.04.13 2018누14
징계처분취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The defendant bears the total costs of the lawsuit after the filing of the appeal.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited by the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or deletion of the following contents among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The "Special Post Offices Act" in the 2nd three parallels shall be "Gu Special Post Offices Act (Amended by Act No. 11690, Mar. 23, 2013; hereinafter the "Gu Special Post Offices Act")."

Each "Special Post Offices" in the 2nd 4th , 3th , 8th , and 10th , shall be improved to the "Gu Special Post Offices".

4. To delete 14 to 20 pages.

The 6th parallel 14 to 9th parallel 1st parallel 14 as follows:

Article 13 of the former Special Post Offices Act provides that “The Minister of Knowledge Economy may pay fees and office expenses necessary for performing the duties of a special post office or deliver goods.” The authority of the Minister of Knowledge Economy related to the said duties is delegated to the filing of a request for delay by Presidential Decree. The former Enforcement Rule of the Special Post Offices Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning No. 24, Sept. 2, 2014; hereinafter referred to

Article 17 provides that "The head of an application for delay shall pay handling fees for the duties handled by a special post office, and the kinds of duties to be paid and the amount to be paid shall be determined and publicly notified by the head of Korea Post

The above provision only provides that the Minister of Knowledge Economy may pay fees necessary for performing the duties of a special post office, and does not specify the purpose of the use of the fees, and the above provision stipulates that the applicant shall pay the handling fees for the duties of the special post office, and does not specify the purpose of the use of the handling fees.

In full view of the above legal provisions, the Enforcement Rule, and the above facts of recognition, the Plaintiff’s deposit account in D.

arrow