logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원동부지원 2012.04.27 2009가합3851
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties 1) The plaintiff A is a member of the Jsantegian jointly operated by the defendant E and the non-party I (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant").

(2) The defendant E is the father of the plaintiff, the plaintiff C and D, and the plaintiff Eul is the father of the plaintiff, the plaintiff C and the plaintiff Eul are the children of the plaintiff, the plaintiff Eul are the father of the child, the defendant F are the nurse of the defendant, the nurse of the defendant, and the defendant G are the assistant nurse of the defendant council.

B. Plaintiff A’s delivery and the past 1) The Plaintiff was receiving medical treatment for pregnancy from Defendant Council members, and was hospitalized in Defendant Council members for only the portion around 20:00 on September 24, 2008, which became the 38th week of pregnancy, and around H 15:10 on the following day, Plaintiff C was delivered through a revolving part, and Plaintiff C was delivered around 15:18 on the same day. Defendant E was retired from Defendant Council members around 18:00 to 19:00 on the same day. Plaintiff A continuously complained of the pain part and the clothes part after delivery, and on September 25, 2008, Plaintiff A was hospitalized in the middle part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part and the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the body part of the Plaintiff at around 19:40 on September 25, 2008.

Plaintiff

At around 20:30 on the same day, A was able to live in a brush, and at this time, K inspected the status of the work at the Defendant Hospital, but the degree of the brush was good.

However, as the blood species in the Plaintiff’s womb were confirmed, and the blood pressure was measured at a lower level of 80/50m Hg, K heading Defendant E, and Defendant E arrive at around 21:20.

After arrival, Defendant E conducted blood transfusion for Plaintiff A, and at the time, the result of the blood test of Plaintiff A was 5.6gm/dl.

3) Defendant E, around 23:50 on the same day, talked that it is necessary to conduct an operation to confirm the blood level of Plaintiff A with respect to the same day, was admitted to the operating room, but came to the operating room at around 03:30. Defendant E, around 02:0 on September 26, 2008, was 6.4gm/dl of Plaintiff A’s Hogle. 4m/Dl.) immediately after departure from the operating room, to transfer the Plaintiff A and B to a general hospital.

arrow