logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2019.07.10 2019고단141
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at around 00:39 on April 7, 2019, while driving the said car and driving the said car into the public health clinic in order to prevent accidents by driving the car safely, such as reducing speed according to road conditions and operating the brake system accurately, while driving the car at the public health clinic in order to prevent accidents by driving the car, the Defendant neglected his duty of care at all hours and did not reduce speed, and failed to operate the brake system properly due to negligence, which caused the damage to the driving direction of the said car to the right side of the said car, while driving the said car on the front side of the said car by driving the said car and driving the said car at around 0:39 on April 7, 2019. However, the Defendant did not immediately repair the said car and repair the said car by driving the car at the public health clinic in order to prevent the accident by driving the car from being driven by the driver G car owned by the victim who was parked at the front of the said car, and did not immediately repair the said car by the victim 97 1970-14 of the said car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation;

1. Relevant Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The sentence is imposed as ordered, taking into account all the circumstances of sentencing indicated in the arguments and records, including the following facts: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act; (b) the recognition of the facts charged and reflects on the facts charged; (c) the degree of damage to the victims; and (d) the neglect of scattering after the accident did not cause any subsequent accident.

arrow