logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.06.30 2016고정254
재물손괴
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a two-year suspended sentence of imprisonment with labor for property damage, etc. from the Incheon District Court Branch Branch on June 24, 2015, and the same year.

7.2 The foregoing judgment became final and conclusive.

On January 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) listened to the phrase “D” operated by the victim C on the first floor of the building underground of the Nowon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seocheon-gu B, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by destroying the glass door amounting to KRW 200,000,000 in the market price by putting the door door up to several times; (b) cutting off the glass door equivalent to the market price of KRW 100,000 in the same way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Written estimate;

1. Photographs;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of investigation reports (the confirmation of concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the same Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that criminal records of the same kind of sentencing may be used for the same reason. On the other hand, confession, reflectivity, relatively minor damage, and partial recovery of damage and consent to the victim’s punishment is not possible. In particular, consideration of equity in cases where a judgment is rendered simultaneously with a judgment on March 1, 2015, which became final and conclusive, interferes with the damage of property, interference with business and assault, interference with the performance of official duties on March 25, 2015, interference with the damage of property and interference with business on April 2, 2015, and interference with the use of a deadly weapon on May 1, 2015.

arrow