The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In spite of the absence of the fact that the defendant, as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the money, there is an error of mistake in the judgment of the court below that found the defendant guilty.

B. The punishment sentenced by the court below on the ground of unfair sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, including the acts of co-defendant A, the content of damage, the situation before and after the crime, the attitude of the statement in the court below, and the fact that there seems to be any circumstance to be false in the statement, etc., the defendant and co-defendant A, who are co-defendants in the judgment of the court below, can sufficiently be recognized that the defendant, as stated in the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below, conspired with the co-defendant A, who are co-defendants in collusion with the victim and acquired money from the female, in collusion with the victim.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is not accepted.

3. There is no change in the terms and conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment on the grounds that no new data on sentencing have been submitted in the final judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing. In full view of all the reasons for sentencing as stated by the lower court, the original judgment’s sentence is within the scope of the sentencing discretion assigned to the lower court, and it cannot be deemed that the said sentence is inappropriate because

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is not accepted.

4. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.