1. The Defendant: 11,557,600 won to the Plaintiff, and 6% per annum from September 26, 2017 to February 19, 2019, and the next day.

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The Plaintiff is a legal entity established for the purpose of manufacturing primary wood products, primary wood products, etc.

Belgium The defendant is a corporation established for the purpose of the trade business of kitchen supplies.

B. (1) When the Defendant received a request from the insurance company D (hereinafter referred to as the “BAD”) for the supply of the raw stimula to be offered for sales promotion or home shopping supply, the Defendant visited the Plaintiff’s office on December 2, 2016 and asked the Plaintiff about whether the supply was made or not, and the Plaintiff responded to 300 production per day.

The Plaintiff sent a written estimate to the Defendant on December 20, 2016, and sent a unit price table, etc. on January 2, 2017. On January 3, 2017, the Plaintiff provided four sample Doma (one form, large, medium, and small). On January 11, 2017, the Plaintiff sent promotional video.

C. (1) On January 11, 2017, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff (26,000 won per unit) on February 15, 2017, (26,000 won per unit) 1,000 won, and (26,000 won per unit) on February 20, 2017.

B. From February 23, 2017 to March 10, 2017, the Plaintiff supplied 200 items to the Defendant and 1,345 items in total. D.

(1) On February 2017, E and F (the Defendant’s staff member) visited the Plaintiff’s production factory and gave guidance to the Plaintiff’s staff (G director).

D. The decision-making bank ordered 10,000 to the Defendant after the factory visit, which, on March 10, 2017, the Defendant re-exploited 10,000 to the Plaintiff (large, 26,000 won per unit).

Consolidatedly, the Plaintiff delivered 150 items to the Defendant from March 13, 2017 to March 24, 2017, and 75 items, including 887 items.

E. E and F visited the Plaintiff’s production plant at the end of March 2017 and at the beginning of April 2017.

F. On May 15, 2017, the Defendant urged the Plaintiff to supply the order, and ordered 120 small and medium-sized 120 additional orders, but on the same day, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant that it is difficult to deliver the order due to the suspension of production.

【Evidence Gap’s evidence Nos. 4, 1 through 5-.