A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a tea with Cmast in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

On July 13, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.182% of blood alcohol level around 18:30 on July 13, 2016, driven the said van, and driven the three-lane road near the Malina Road in the direction of the Malia Road, along the direction of the Malia Road in the direction of the Malia Road.

The Defendant, prior to the same direction, was followed by the E-Wltered vehicle driven by the victim D (Taking the age of 39). In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to ensure safety distance to avoid when a vehicle driver stops the said A-Wld vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to drive a vehicle in the vicinity of the Defendant due to the negligence of driving the vehicle in the vicinity of the Defendant, she saw the rear panion of the said vehicle in the front line of the said Gohap, and due to its shock, the front panion of the said vehicle was driven by the victim F (37 years of age) who was stopped in the front line by the victim F (37 years of age).

As a result, the Defendant driven the said van while it is difficult to drive it normally due to influence of alcohol, and suffered injury to the victim D, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires medical treatment for about three weeks, and injury to the victim F, such as dump, tension, etc. of the dume, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driving a cambling vehicle under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.182% of alcohol level in the section of about 3 km from the road near the bathing beach parking lot located in the above 1-dong, Jeju-si, to the place of the accident at around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;