logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원정읍지원 2013.11.21 2011가단5934
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 40,047,060 as well as its annual rate from June 1, 2010 to November 21, 2013 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is KRW 38,00,000 for the construction cost in 2009 against the Defendant (i.e., KRW 6,230,000 for the remainder of the construction cost in 2009; KRW 2,230,000 for the defect repair charge of KRW 700,000 for the defect repair charge of KRW 5,345,000 for the defect repair charge of KRW 13,337,00 for the Cheongcheon Bridge 13,337,000 for the Gyeongcheon Bridge 360,000 for the Hasan School Corporation Corporation; KRW 360,00 for the 10,000 for the 10,000,000 for the 10,200,000 for the 200,000 for the 205,000 for the 2010 for the 205,0106,5106.

2. Determination

A. In full view of the purport of the arguments as to the remainder of the construction cost in 2009 and the claim portion of the rent for Cheongcheon-do B, including the carter, the following: (a) In full view of the purport of the arguments as to the remainder of the construction cost in 2009 and the claim portion of the rent for the 13,345,00 won, 10,000 won for the unpaid construction cost, 20,000 won for the 10,000,000 won for the 30,000 won for the 10,000,000 won for the 10,000,000 won for the 30,000,000 won for the 30,000,000 won for the 30,000,000 won for the 30,000,000 won for the 30,000,00 won for the 10,000 other evidence (the evidence).

[2] As to the above, the defendant shall pay the above construction cost to the plaintiff.

arrow