The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The main point of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding) is that the allegation of unreasonable sentencing is subsequent to the lapse of the period for filing an appeal.

Although the defendant has changed the lane in the future of the victim's vehicle at the time, there is no fact that he was rapid reduction, so it cannot be said that he threatened the victim.

Judgment

Comprehensively taking into account the following facts or circumstances, which are duly admitted and examined by the court below, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant has threatened the victim by using the vehicle of the defendant as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment below.

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

According to the black image set up on the victim's vehicle, if the vehicle of the victim is changed in the front of the defendant's vehicle where the vehicle of the victim is running one lane and the speed of the vehicle is delayed due to the speed by the speed control car installed on the front side, it is confirmed that if the driver's vehicle of the defendant is driven by the victim's own vehicle through two lanes, and then the vehicle of the victim is in close vicinity to the victim's vehicle at a sufficient speed so that the victim may feel a threat, and then the vehicle of the victim is accelerated by the change into the one lane, and the vehicle of the victim is changed to the two lanes as soon as possible.

The above act of the defendant constitutes intimidation by the act of threatening the victim.

The victim consistently made a statement from an investigative agency to the court of the court below to the same purport as the facts stated in the crime in the judgment of the court below, and such statement is credibility in accordance with the above images.

The Defendant, in the case of a party, has no record of stopping the victim in front of the victim’s vehicle. However, this is the victim’s statement and the victim’s status.

shall be in place with the pages identified in the video recorded in the paragraph.

The Defendant also stated in the police that “I got balked with balk because it was the same as salkeing of the vehicle.”

In light of this point.