logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.08.27 2013고단957
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for defendant B and C, for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 957] Defendant B is the victim F’s work partner fee, Defendant A is the person who introduced the victim from Defendant B, and Defendant C is the actual owner of the real estate of KRW 1,488 square meters prior to Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

The Defendants introduced the victims to purchase the instant real estate in a successive manner, and attempted to acquire the difference by deceiving the victims as if the purchase price of the instant real estate delegated by H was larger than the actual purchase price.

Defendant

B and A around 20:0 on January 7, 2009, at the J Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I, the victim succeeded to the secured debt amounting to KRW 215,00,000,000 for the real estate of this case, but the victim actually paid the remainder of KRW 125,000,000 for the secured debt amounting to the secured debt amounting to KRW 90,000,000,000 for the real estate of this case, and entered into a sales contract with the Defendant C, a seller of the real estate of this case, and entered into a sales

However, in fact, the Defendants did not notify the victims of the fact that they were delegated to purchase the instant real estate from the said H with KRW 165 million (including succession to the collateral obligation of KRW 90 million, including the actual payment of KRW 75 million).

The Defendants received KRW 21.5 million from the victim as the down payment on the same day. On January 9, 2009, the Defendants received KRW 1,580,000,000, including KRW 2,300,000,000 from Defendant B’s account as the down payment, and then divided KRW 50,000,000,000, which is the difference between the actual purchase price and the actual purchase price.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim's property by deceiving the victim.

[2] Around March 2010, the Defendant was delegated with the conclusion of a lease agreement on the above office from L’s wife F, the owner of the 7th floor office in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Office of the 7th floor office in the K Building, and the above L’s name.

arrow