A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:30 on February 6, 2019, the Defendant sent a box in Ulsan-gun B, Ulsan-gun, for the reason that he saw a taxi engineer who listens to the civil petition that the Defendant does not get off from the taxi and saw the taxi engineer to do so, the Defendant would be capable of drinking her b. B. We are not a civilian stick. The Defendant she would be able to cope with her b. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. d. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. c. f. f. f. c. f. c. f. f. c. f. f. f. f. c. f. f. c. c. f. f. c. f. f. c. f. c. f. f. f. f.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the crime prevention and maintenance of order of police officers, and at the same time two-day medical treatment for the victim was needed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes to the field and photographs of damaged police officers;

1. Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that the Defendant had been punished several times due to the same kind of violent crime, etc., the nature of the instant crime is not good, and that it is not agreed with the victim, etc., the sentence of imprisonment is inevitable for the Defendant.

However, the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as ordered by considering all of the facts that the defendant recognized and reflected all of the crimes of this case.