logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.06.09 2017고정751
청소년보호법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a package package in the name of “D” in front of the exit 1st century in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. A person who intends to run a general restaurant business in violation of the Food Sanitation Act shall report to the competent authority. However, the Defendant, without reporting to the competent authority on June 29, 2016, up to February 20, 2017, with four trustees, 16 chairs, gas sirens, and cooking facilities in the area of approximately 6.6 square meters in the above place from around June 29, 2016 to February 20, and operated a general restaurant business in which sales amounting to an average of 70,000 won per day was calculated by cooking and selling a sng-sng, sngng-sng, and sng-sng-sng, sng

2. No person who violates the Juvenile Protection Act shall sell, lend or distribute to juveniles alcoholic beverages that are harmful to juveniles;

Nevertheless, around February 20, 2017, the Defendant sold the amount of KRW 39,000,000 for liquor liquor 5 sick, chickens, etc. without verifying the age to the job-free behaviors, such as E (V, 15 years of age), a juvenile who entered the above packing 21:40 on February 20, 201.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A E-document;

1. Application of statutes on business photographs and images;

1. Subparagraph 1 of Article 97 of the Food Sanitation Act, Article 37 (4) (the occupation of a unreported restaurant business) of the relevant Act on criminal facts, subparagraph 6 of Article 59 of the Juvenile Protection Act, and Article 28 (1) (the occupation of a juvenile liquor sales) of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow