1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. On February 20, 2013, the Defendant concluded, through the Plaintiff’s insurance solicitor B, an insurance contract with the Defendant and the insured as C, with the insurance contractor KRW 200 million in the event of the death of the disease, and the beneficiary of the death insurance contract with the content that the Defendant designates as the Defendant (hereinafter “instant insurance”).

B. At the time of entering into the insurance contract of this case, the Defendant indicated that “the obligation to notify the contract prior to the conclusion of the contract” attached to the subscription is that the insured was damp by a doctor as follows through a medical examination or examination during the latest five years, and that “the fact that the insured was subject to the following medical practice (in-depth for at least seven consecutive days, surgery, medical treatment for at least seven consecutive days)” and was signed by C by the doctor during the latest five years through a medical examination or examination [the following medical practice [the disease related to cancer, white blood, high blood pressure, stropha, heart, heart color, heart color, heart strophathrom, strophathrom, strophathrom, stropham, stropha, workplace, or anti-examination].

C. On the other hand, after drinking alcohol on May 25, 2007, C performed a blood test in the D Hospital with a clothes, etc. AST/AL 93/121 was found to have a strong level of liver functions (AST 93/121). On May 11, 2009, the results of the test conducted at the E internal medical clinic were found to have exceeded alcohol liver and liver functions.

C On February 23, 2013, which was three days after the conclusion of the instant insurance contract, the Busan National University Hospital was diagnosed as livering, and died on August 21, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, 5 through 7 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 2, the result of fact inquiry about the members within Eth of the court of first instance, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiff alleged by the parties concerned shall continue to treat C above the past function for the purpose of the defendant's wrongful acquisition of high-amount insurance proceeds.