Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. C was driving a D cargo vehicle on January 21, 2013, and around 13:30 on January 21, 2013, and E was sent to the emergency room of F Hospital operated by Defendant B.
The plaintiff is an insurance company that is a member of the above cargo vehicle, and the defendant A is a doctor who treated E.
B. On January 21, 2013, at around 14:14, 2013, both parts CT shooting showed that a small amount of light fluoral transfusion and left-hand side fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral, the left-hand side fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral flu
At the time, E's consciousness was a mixed money or an island.
C. On January 22, 2013, around 11:16, 2013, care for a protector was deemed to have been helpful to the symptoms, and was transferred to a general sick room. On the same day, around 22:40 days, food was mixed.
At around 23:00 on January 22, 2013, two parts CT shooting confirmed that the cerebrovascular dose has increased, and on January 23, 2013, the emergency brain operation was performed on or around 00:30 on January 23, 2013, but the E (hereinafter “the deceased”) died on February 15, 2013 because symptoms do not show.
E. On February 21, 2013, the Plaintiff agreed with the deceased’s bereaved family members and paid KRW 61,618,090.
[Ground of recognition] The non-contentious facts, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including each number), the result of this court's entrustment of the examination of medical records to the director of Busan University Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment
A. As a result of the Plaintiff’s assertion of CT shooting at the time of the Plaintiff’s internal source, the two parts of the two parts were observed on the right-hand side of the brain salutism, the left-hand side salutism, and the two parts of the back salute were continuously seen, and thus, the Defendant A did not have to conduct a periodic inspection, such as taking CT shooting at an interval of eight and twenty-four hours in consideration of the merger certificate of delayed blood transfusion, and to take necessary measures.
In addition, the deceased was in need of intensive observation of medical personnel in the middle-patient room.