1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The Defendant Company filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff in Seoul Eastern District Court 201Gahap19599, and the Defendant Company became aware of the Plaintiff, who is a de facto manager of the Defendant Company, through the introduction of F, which is a broadcaster, and decided to enter the entertainment business upon the Plaintiff’s recommendation even though there was no experience in the entertainment business. ② E promised from the Plaintiff to contribute to the entertainment business, which would make the Plaintiff play an best effort to ensure the success of E’s entertainment business by using the connection and know-how with the Plaintiff, and to contribute to the Plaintiff’s best efforts for the success of E’s entertainment business, and to perform the entertainment business by investing considerable amount of money of KRW 162,783,590 in capital through the Defendant Company. ③ However, the Defendant Company was unable to assist the Defendant Company in business feasibility, and the Defendant Company sustained losses due to the Plaintiff’s failure to perform its business on account of the Plaintiff’s failure to perform its business on the part of the Plaintiff’s compensation for damages.

On January 27, 2012, the Plaintiff agreed between the Defendant Company and the Defendant Company to the effect that “(i) the Plaintiff pays KRW 100 million to the Defendant Company in installments within two years, and ② the Defendant Company withdraws the Plaintiff’s lawsuit against the Seoul Eastern District Court 201Ga19599.” The Plaintiff drafted a performance note (A 5) accordingly.

According to this agreement, the defendant company withdrawn the lawsuit of the Seoul East Eastern District Court 201Gahap19599 on January 31, 2012.

On February 7, 2012, the Plaintiff issued one copy of the Promissory Notes (Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Receiving Company, the par value of KRW 100 million, the payment date of KRW 100 million, the place of payment, the place of payment, and the place of issuance, respectively. The Plaintiff issued one Promissory Notes (Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the place of payment) as a notary public’s office No. 171.