The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was dispatched from the Defendant on the street around 22:30 on March 16, 2014, at around 22:30, the Defendant: (a) received a 112 report from the Defendant on the street in front of the Southern-si B apartment complex 205, and then asked the Defendant about the details of the report to the Defendant; (b) the Defendant asked the victim C and D, who is a police officer, to ask the Defendant about the circumstances of the report; (c) three persons, such as the neighbor E, who is a neighboring resident; (d) “I am if I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am am, I am the victims of the report.

2. The reasons for dismissing the prosecution of this case are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, which can be prosecuted only upon a victim’s complaint pursuant to Article 312(1) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, since the victims submitted a letter of withdrawal of complaint that the victims would revoke their complaint against the defendant around May 21, 2014, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.