logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.09.19 2017가단5860
공유물분할
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Lawsuit for partition of co-litigation is an essential co-litigation in which a co-owner who claims partition becomes the plaintiff and all other co-owners shall be the co-defendant.

(see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Da78556, Jan. 29, 2014). The Plaintiff was issued an order to dismiss a complaint on July 23, 2018, by failing to correct the address despite having been served with the order to rectify the address of co-owners C, D, and E by the court. The said order to dismiss a complaint was finalized as it is.

Therefore, the lawsuit of this case filed against only the other co-owners except the co-owners whose complaint was rejected, falls under a case where it is inappropriate and not possible to correct the defect because it does not meet the requirements for an inherent indispensable co-litigation that should be the co-defendant, and thus, the lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed without pleading pursuant to Article 2

arrow