All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant C’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that Defendant C was guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the part not guilty of the lower court) on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, thereby exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine as

2. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant P in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment below, the court below is just in finding Defendant P guilty of the facts charged of this case on the grounds as stated in its holding. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.