The plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 10, 1983, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on April 30, 2018 while serving in the Navy, and discharged from military service on April 30, 2018.

B. On July 20, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration with the Defendant for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State by asserting that “vertebrate” (hereinafter “instant wounds”) was as follows:

Around April 1984, there is a reason why the injury occurred and transported ammunition boxes (45 kg) from the ammunition in the process of loading and unloading ammunition for the regular repair of naval vehicles.

They were sleeping to sleep, and they were sleeped on the sleep.

The results of the MRI shooting conducted in the National Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital, despite the fact that spine was completely reverse and disced, it was not properly treated in terms of the circumstances of naval vessels.

In around 2008, 71 Maduria had occurred during the inspection of the Maduriation devices, and Maduria had been treated by the National Armed Forces Water Service Hospital after being taken MaI photographs and Maduria.

On September 2014, 2014, at the time of the miscellaneous removal of the knife and around the land, the blife had been hospitalized in the Daejeon National Armed Forces Hospital, which led to the deepening of hurgic pain due to the operation of the towing

B, after having undergone spine (1-5), hospitalized treatment was conducted at Daejeon National Armed Forces Hospital for a period of two months.

After February 20, 2018, the hurgical pain aggravated, and was treated again and discharged from the hospital.

The National Pension Service was judged as having a disability in the fourth degree.

C. On February 27, 2019, the Defendant decided that the instant wound does not meet the requirements of injury (or disease) incurred during the performance of official duties, and issued a disposition that does not meet the requirements of Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State and Article 2(1)2 of the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”). [Grounds for recognition] An absence of dispute, entry in Gap’s 1 through 3, and Eul’s 1 and 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is an ammunition in a long-term vessel.