1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 40,325,436 and among them 2,329.

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant 1) C and D were married on March 25, 1958, and they were divorced around November 7, 2001 by setting up the E, Plaintiff, F, G, H, and Defendant under the sleeps. C died on November 7, 201. At the time, the network C (hereinafter “the deceased”).

The heir of the said Plaintiff and the Defendant, E, F, G, and H. 2) The Defendant is residing together with D from May 19, 2012 to May 19, 2012 from the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

B. On May 2, 2008, the Deceased’s will was prepared on his own writing on May 2, 2008, as indicated below (hereinafter “the will of this case”). The will of this case contains the full text, the full text, date, and the full name and seal of the will, but the address of the Deceased is not indicated.

However, on the front of an envelope containing the instant will document, it is written as the “Will” on its own face, and on the left upper end of the envelope, the name and address of the deceased (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Jung-gu I) are printed on one hand.

Testamentary design

1. JA-2701 No. Ap shall be transferred to A;

2. It shall contribute 5 billion won to the Scholarship Foundation, among financial assets that are deposited in the Han River Points in Korea, the Han River Points in the degree of relationship, and the mountainous districts for the Han River Bank and the SC Bank;

3. The remainder except the amount of the contribution under the preceding paragraph shall be made available to A, G and H three equal distributions to inheritance.

(Omission) On May 2, 2008 C friendlys;

C. As a result of litigation, etc., 1) Defendant A, E, and F did not indicate the address of the deceased in the instant testamentary document against the Plaintiff, G, and H (hereinafter “instant testamentary document”) at the Seoul Central District Court. The instant testamentary document does not include the address of the deceased, and the address indicated in the plastic document is not a place where the deceased actually resided. As such, the instant testament’s document was not indicated as a legal requirement of the testament under the self-written document, and it did not self-written and sealed it while deleting and modifying the text. Therefore, the instant will was made.