The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of KRW 7 million) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant reflects the crime of this case, and the fact that the defendant's B car is covered by a comprehensive insurance policy is favorable.

However, the Defendant, while under the influence of Maurju, caused the instant accident by negligence while driving the said vehicle while running the said vehicle, causing the injury to the victims, and the nature of the crime is not good, and the Defendant agreed with the victims.

In light of the following: (a) there is no particular circumstance or change in circumstances in which the sentence of the court below is to be mitigated in the trial or in the trial; (b) traffic crime group within the scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee; (c) traffic accident group; (d) the first category of the crime of general traffic accident; (e) the special scams (in the event of minor injury, where illegality in the proviso of Article 3(2) of the Traffic Act is emphasized); (d) the decision on the recommended area (basic area); (e) the scope of the recommended sentence (e.g., April 10), and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances before and after the crime, the sentence against the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.