A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On February 24, 2015, at the “C” restaurant located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on February 04, 2015, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute with the victim on the ground that the victim D (n, 20 years of age) who was frightened by drinking alcohol in another seat while drinking alcohol, was frightened, and frightened by the victim; and (b) followed the victim, who moved in the above restaurant, who was frightened by the victim at the above restaurant, was frightened, and was frightened by the victim, who was frightened in the above restaurant, and who was frightened in the above restaurant, then threatened the victim by following the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement law to D;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the sphere of recommendation] of the sentence under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence [Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act] [Article 62(4) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution [the basic sphere of special intimidation]: Six months to one year [the grounds for mitigation]: 4 months and one year [the grounds for mitigation]: 4 months and one year [the possibility of criticism for the act of intimidation by using a deadly weapon] is not small; however, the defendant's mistake is recognized; the defendant has agreed with the victim; the defendant's age, character and behavior; and all kinds of conditions of sentencing as shown in the oral proceedings such as the defendant'

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.