All appeals filed by the Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff against the instant principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the principal office.

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, citing the reasoning of the judgment, is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition and modification below.

2. Parts added and corrected;

A. On March 15, 2017, the fourth 15th 15th 201 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The Defendant added the following facts: “If the Plaintiff had already provided the Defendant with the death amount of the launcher prior to entering into the instant contract, the Defendant shall confirm the death amount of the launcher, and design and manufacture the gold-type to comply with it; ⑤ The purpose of the instant contract is to be deemed as a gold-type production, and the instant contract cannot be deemed as having been completed if it is impossible to see that the production was completed in accordance with the contract, as the Defendant failed to supply the gold-type to the Defendant at the fifth 12th tier of the judgment of the court of first 1, as the Plaintiff did not supply the gold-type to the Defendant for a considerable period of time, and even if the Plaintiff did not supply the gold-type to the Defendant, the Defendant did not supply the gold-type to the Defendant for a considerable period of time.”