logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.08.13 2015고단1227
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1227"

1. The Defendant, as the owner of the above B Baco Ba, is a person who is engaged in driving of the above vehicle. On February 1, 2015, the Defendant driving the above C Baco Baco Do not covered by mandatory insurance at around 0.220% of the blood alcohol content around 20:06, and driving the above C Baco Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do dong, thereby driving the vehicle in front of the “D Do Do Do” located in Incheon Jung-gu, Jung-gu, Incheon. In such a case, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving the vehicle, has a duty of care to prevent accidents beforehand

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of driving the Defendant’s vehicle by negligence in the course of duty, thereby damaging the repair cost of approximately KRW 1,00,888 of FE owned by the victim E, which was parked at that place, with the Defendant’s vehicle. The Defendant destroyed the victim’s HM3 vehicle using the victim’s HM3 vehicle and thereby damaging the repair cost of approximately KRW 2,486,582. The Defendant demanded the victim’s Jland Jland Co., Ltd. owned by the victim I to stop at the victim E-site by destroying the repair cost of approximately KRW 1,116,720, while the scattering of the vehicle is away from the road, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

"2015 Highest 3490"

2. On June 3, 2015, at around 20:30, the Defendant driven the Bcoon-line truck without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 35 km from the front of the restaurant “Yakak field” located in 36, 423, Jung-gu, Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon, to the 82-rooak-gu, Yeonsu-gu, Yeonsu-gu, In order to the end of the 35 km apartment, the Defendant driven the Bcoon-line truck.

3. The defendant is the owner of the above two vehicles, and no motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance shall be operated on the road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated an automobile that was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above 2.

b)a summary of the evidence;

arrow