Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the Gu B apartment 117 Gu's apartment in Changwon-si, and the victim F is a person who resides in the same apartment.

On June 19, 2016, at around 22:58, the Defendant: (a) on the website operated with only one unit of apartment complex located in the foregoing apartment complex; (b) on the website operated by a person who uses the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit of the unit

In this regard, it is not possible to examine the quality problems of the representative of Dong in the Dong.

The comments on the comments on “” were posted, and on which they were “-to write comments on comments,” and “hingn only by a number of people H-Dong representatives H-dong experts, but they continued to put up and hingn, and eventually, I would like to ambling and debrising up to our citizens, which are the head of the City/Do. The self-esteem and honor of our people who were the representatives of the Republic of China and Japan are protected by one body, where they are the representatives of the Republic of Korea and Japan.

Bathrooms are weak.

- In the offline, the racos shall be resolved directly on the offline by the unclaimed comments.

In the article, “A resident of the above apartment is openly insulting the victim so that anyone can confirm it.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (where submitted);

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant asserts that the illegality of the Defendant’s assertion on the assertion of the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not constitute the elements of the crime of insult, or that the Defendant’s comments do not violate the social rules, and thus, are excluded.

However, the expressions such as the Defendant’s “Tyman’s writing writing” and “disist,” etc. can undermine the social evaluation of the victim’s individual.