1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Plaintiff

A asserts that the Defendant B lent the amount of KRW 30 million to the Defendant, and that the Defendant B loaned the amount of KRW 20 million to the Defendant, and sought the return of the loan against the Defendant.

According to the evidence No. 1-2, No. 1-2, No. 2, and No. 3, respectively, the plaintiff A deposited KRW 10 million around April 4, 2012, and KRW 20 million around May 9, 2012 into the defendant's account as the defendant's seat, and the plaintiff B deposited KRW 20 million on August 20, 2012 into the defendant's account.

However, with respect to the fact that the plaintiffs lent the above money to the defendant, it is not sufficient to recognize the above only by the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5-1 and 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, according to the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 3, 9, and 10, the defendant, from April 2012, operated a single house with the plaintiff Eul's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son's son

Therefore, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.