1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B is within the scope of the property inherited from the network C, and 33,55.

According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1 through 4 and Nos. 1 through 3 and all of the arguments, the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund entered into a credit guarantee agreement with Defendant A around 1996 with Defendant A, and filed a lawsuit for indemnity amount with Defendant A on August 17, 2007 with the Seoul Central District Court 2007Kadan191678, and then paid to the Plaintiff 33,55,720 won jointly and severally and severally, and 31,570,890 won per annum from the above court on August 11, 1996 to the day of complete payment, and confirmed the business, the Korea Technology Credit Guarantee Fund transferred the above claim to the Plaintiff on July 22, 201 and notified the obligor of the transfer of the claim, and C received the approval from the inheritor on August 21, 201 to the heir on August 21, 207.

Thus, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay to the plaintiff 3,55,720 won and damages for delay at the rate of 17% per annum from August 11, 1996 to the day of complete payment.

Defendant B asserted to the effect that the Plaintiff’s claim filed by the suit does not have any benefit to the protection of rights or constitutes an abuse of rights even though the liquidation procedures for the property inherited from the deceased C have not yet been completed, or that the claim constitutes an abuse of rights. However, the limitation of liability is limited and the obligation is extinguished.

It is not reasonable to say that the creditor's exercise of rights cannot be deemed improper because there is no responsible property or that there is no responsible property.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is accepted on the ground of the reasons.