logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.07.17 2017고정56
사문서위조등
Text

The sentence of sentence shall be suspended for the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 11, 2015, the Defendant of a private document forgery: (a) at a D church located in C at Won-si, an original state around September 11, 2015; (b) on the “written confirmation of the official seal” form prepared and printed by a computer on the paper A4, the Defendant stated “E religious organization D church”; (c) affix the official seal used by the said church on the column of the official seal to be used; and (d) confirm that the said official seal is an official seal used by the E religious organization D church at this E religious organization.

The phrase “E religious organization D church” and “F” were indicated as “registration of the transfer of a motor vehicle: “registration of the transfer of a motor vehicle” and “registration of the transfer of a motor vehicle; the staff of the above church, who was named at the bottom of the document, stated the name in the name column as “E religious organization D church” and “F” in the name column of the organization; and the seal of “F” produced and kept in the name column of the organization.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation of official seal in F name.

2. The Defendant, at the time, place, and name-free church staff at the above paragraph 1, exercised the above investigation document using a copy of the forged official seal certificate as if it were a document duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing official seal certificates;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of uttering of the above investigation document), and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448

1. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s defense counsel’s assertion of a fine of KRW 1,00,000 ( KRW 100,000 per day from exchange custody) to be suspended. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s defense counsel’s preparation of a written confirmation of the official seal under the name of the instant F is for the disposal of automobiles delegated through a resolution to hold a meeting of the D church members.

arrow