Defendant

In addition, all appeals filed by the respondent for attachment order and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Part 1 of the case of the defendant and the person to whom the attachment order was requested (hereinafter referred to as the "defendant")

(A) misunderstanding of facts and misunderstanding of legal principles (as to attempted murder), the Defendant did not find the victim to kill the victim; the Defendant saw the victim with a knife to protect the victim’s own knife and knife the knife; the Defendant did not display the knife the knife from the beginning; and the Defendant knife the knife with the knife and knife the knife.

There was no intention to kill the victim.

(2) Even if the intent of murder is recognized, it constitutes an attempted murder since the victim scambling the scambling of the scambling with the scambling of the scam and ceased 119 declaration.

B) The sentence imposed by the lower court (five years of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable and unfair.2) The prosecutor (unjustifiable punishment)’s sentence imposed by the lower court is too uneasible and unfair.

B. In light of the part of the request for attachment order (public prosecutor), Defendant’s criminal method, plannedness, Defendant’s previous conviction, etc., it is difficult to view that Defendant is against the attempted murder crime, and the lower judgment dismissing Defendant’s request for attachment order since it is dangerous to repeat the murder crime.

2. Determination on the part of the defendant's case

가. 피고인의 사실오인 및 법리오해 주장에 대한 판단 1 살인의 고의가 없었다는 주장에 대하여 피고인은 원심에서도 이 부분 항소이유와 동일한 주장을 하였고, 이에 대하여 원심은 먼저 살인죄에서 고의에 관한 법리를 설시한 후 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 피고인은 미리 칼 2개를 준비하고 피해자를 찾아 나선 후 피해자를 만나자마자 칼을 쥔 오른손 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 1회 때렸고 반격을 받게 되자 왼손으로 피해자의 상체를 잡고 오른손에 든 칼로 피해자의...