Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a C-Scar.

On October 4, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 17:48, and, at the time of the strike, the three-lane of sight 39 at sight was driven by the Defendant, from the four-lanes at sight to the one-lanes at sight, at the two-lanes from the two-lanes at sight.

At all times, signal apparatuses and crosswalks are installed on the front door, so in such cases, the driver had a duty of care to reduce speed and to safely drive the front door and the right and the right according to the signal apparatus's instructions.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to enter the crosswalks of a stop line due to the negligence of entering the crosswalks of a stop line, and received the victim D (67 years old) and E (86 years old) on the right side from the left side of the running direction of the said vehicle, which opened the crosswalks to the right side according to the pedestrian signals.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim D to suffer from the injury of the closed frame of L2 parts, which requires approximately 8 weeks of treatment, due to such occupational negligence, for the victim E to receive approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written statement of D and E;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The negligence of the defendant who drives a pedestrian crossing due to the suspension of the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act shall be large;

In particular, two victims suffered injuries, and in particular, the degree of harm of E is significant.

The defendant, without taking measures against traffic accidents, has a history of punishment for escape.

The circumstances immediately after the crime are very bad, and the victims are the defendant.