The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that he did not use his blue under his blue with his blue title to assault the victim.

The court below accepted the defendant's assertion and deleted the spits of spits only by recognizing the act of spits of spits without recognizing the act of spits of spits among the act of assault that a prosecutor has instituted

The defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

2. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s act of spitation is self-defense.

The fact that the victim spits the defendant's face and spits the defendant's shoulder with his hand, and the defendant's shoulders over the stairs is recognized.

However, spits or spits against the victim are merely inducing the other party to the act of spits or spits, but it cannot be viewed as a legitimate act to defend the current unfair infringement.

First of all, the fact that the victim attempted was reflected in the sentencing of the court below.

The defendant's assertion of legal principles is without merit.

3. The Defendant asserts that the lower court’s punishment (a fine of KRW 300,00) is unreasonable.

The fact that the victim first avoided the dispute is recognized.

Considering these points, the lower court reduced the amount of fine for summary order.

There is no new circumstance for further reduction.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

4. The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.