Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, and a fine of 2,00,000 won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 02:30 on July 15, 2012, Defendant A: (a) on the offline of “E” operated by Defendant A, the victim F (the age of 37) entered the door house, and the customer F (the age of 37) went together with three parallels; and (b) the victim B went together with B, disregarding B, without doing so, while disregarding B, the victim’s arms and body in the vicinity of the above doorline; and (c) saw B to take the victim’s breath and body around the above door, the victim’s breath and breath, and breath.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. At around 02:30 on July 15, 2012, Defendant B: (a) around 02:30, the victim F, as in the “E” house operated by Defendant A located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) the victim F, as in the above “1”, neglected the Defendant, went out of Korea while disregarding the Defendant; and (c) the victim, as a Kaflas’s disease, had a number of back-of-the-faced disease one time to the victim, leading the victim to a multiple scambling in need

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness F, G and H;

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act: Defendant 2 of the Criminal Act: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant 1: Defendant A and his defense counsel’s assertion of defense counsel under Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act asserts that the Defendant’s act constitutes a justifiable act as an act aimed at clarifying the dispute between Defendant B and F.

According to each of the above evidence, the defendant's defendant B left the victim in order to avoid disregarding himself and the victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim's victim.